Fort Point Principles

Formed in 2008, Fort Point is a boutique wealth advisory for high net-worth individuals and families. Creating a positive investor experience is equal parts design, execution and reporting. At Fort Point, our disciplined, solutions-based investment process is crafted to deliver consistent portfolio returns with dramatically reduced volatility, high liquidity and tax efficiency.

The Asymmetry of Losses

Losses are linear but the gains and time required for a portfolio to recover are exponential. While many investors attempt to maximize returns by chasing gains, we believe it is more practical and sustainable to

grow returns by reducing losses. Taking risk is necessary to enjoy long-term investment success and our responsibility is to ensure those risks are grounded in discipline, not market fervor.

Gain Required To Recover Loss

Diversified Portfolio

A truly diversified portfolio of $10 million has a significantly greater probability of achieving sustainable returns over time than one which tracks the broad equity markets such as the S&P 500 Index. This is because protection against coordinated drawdowns is best achieved by focusing on the breadth, selection and individual risk of the underlying assets, not simply by holding a mixed-bag of securities. Most importantly, returns from the securities are non-correlated.

Beating Biases

In every market bubble, bust or “normal period”, investors make decisions believing that “this time is different”, allowing embedded cognitive biases to overrule discipline. Sustainable returns, however,

require investment discipline during market selloffs, not merely chasing gains in euphoric conditions. We aspire to control the controllables, and that includes placing controls on ourselves.

Gambler's Fallacy The tendency to think that future probabilities are altered by past events, when in reality they are unchanged. Hyperbolic Discounting The tendency for people to have a stronger preference for more immediate payoff relative to later payoffs, where the tendency increases the closer to the present both payoffs are. Selection Bias A distortion of evidence or data that arises from the way that the data are collected. Wishful Thinking Tendency to overestimate the probability of good things happening to them. Stereotyping Expecting a member of a group to have certain characteristics without having actual information about that individual. Bandwagon Effect The tendency to do (or believe) things because many other people do (or believe) the same. Disposition Effect The tendency to sell assets that have increased in value but hold assets that have decreased in value. Confirmation Bias The tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions. Endowment Effect The fact that people often demand much more to give up an object than they would be willing to pay to acquire it. Pseudocertainty Effect The tendency to make risk-averse choices if the expected outcome is positive, but make risk- seeks choices to avoid negative outcomes. Recency Effect Tendency to weigh recent events more than earlier events. Focusing Effect The tendency to place too much importance on one aspect of an event; causes error in accurately predicting the utility of a future outcome. Normalcy Bias The refusal to plan for, or react to, a disaster which has never happened before. Last Illusion Coined by Brian Eno, the belief that someone must know what is going on. Primacy Effect Tendency to weigh initial events more than subsequent events. Hindsight Bias Sometimes called the "I-knew-it-all-along" effect, the tendency to see past events as being predictable. Outcome Bias The tendency to judge a decision by its eventual outcome instead of based on the quality of the decision at the time it was made. Negativity Bias The tendency to pay more attention and give more weight to negative than positive experiences or other kinds of information. Bias Blind Spot The tendency not to compensate for one's own cognitive biases. Survivorship Bias Tendency to concentrate on the people or things that "survived" some process and ignoring those that didn't, or arguing that a strategy is effective given the winners, while ignoring the large number of losers. Zero-risk Bias Preference for reducing a small risk to zero over a greater reduction in a larger risk.

Bubbles & Busts

The typical advisor mantra insists that maximum returns are achieved by maximizing time spent in the market. In reality, missing the worst days of market performance

is more important than capturing the best ones. Every major market event in recent memory indicates that a sustainable return experience is achieved by mitigating losses.

Bubbles And Busts

How »

Controllable Factors

Our Take On Risk

Controlling the Controllable: While asset performance is wholly out of an investor’s control, Fort Point’s investment discipline is grounded in identifying those variables that we can optimize to increase client returns: risk, liquidity, tax efficiency and cost management. Owning a portfolio of assets that behave similarly over time (and particularly in times of stress) increases the risk of catastrophic, coordinated drawdowns.

Global Equities The tradeable stock or capital stock of a business entity represents the original capital paid into or invested in the business by its owners. Stock is distinct from the property and the assets of a business which may fluctuate in quantity and value. The growth of equities correlates to the underlying growth of the business. Real Assets In contrast to global assets, these are tangible or physical assets in nature (eg. real estate, commodities, stamps, art, radio frequencies, water rights). Yield & Rates Securities issued by governments or corporations, which pay a fixed or variable interest rate at regular intervals and repay principal on maturity. Defensive Investment techniques and strategies that either capture risk premia (beta) and/or obtain excess returns (alpha) with low overall correlation to the securities in which they trade (ie. equities, commodities or bonds).

Fort Point allocations consider both quantitative (number and correlation of assets) and qualitative measures (exogenous events that impact volatility). We actively monitor and rebalance asset exposures to most efficiently enhance portfolio diversification and the probability of a consistent, positive return experience.

Our Approach to Allocation

Superior asset correlation and breadth of underlying diversification are key to achieving positive expected returns with reduced risk. Note below the correlations to the S&P 500 over a 3 year period from a standard allocation to a core allocation and, optimally, to our Active Risk Management allocation.

legend

top-circle

Standard

The traditional advisor approach to portfolio diversification is a blend of equities, fixed income and cash. This strategy works fine in a bull market but, without due attention to asset correlation and dynamic rebalancing, is a perfect setup for substantial, coordinated losses when the market turns.

mid-circle

Diversified Core

More than 48 distinct securities are selected across the entire spectrum of asset classes, geographies and strategies to achieve capital appreciation while mitigating market drawdowns. We focus on liquid investments to dynamically rebalance our portfolios for active tax-loss harvesting.

bot-circle

Active Risk Management

Despite broad diversification, highly correlated assets coupled with market volatility leave portfolios over-exposed at precisely the wrong time. We employ an enhanced option overlay strategy to systematically reallocate in any market environment, thus offering investors the benefits of broad-based index investing with superior risk management.

Custody Solutions

If Investment Advisors compete for your business, so should the platforms that service it. A custodian, for example, can be an invaluable partner in dynamically managing, administering and overseeing institutional

investments. We select our institutional partners by their ability to provide a stable platform while reducing your explicit and implicit costs, ensuring clients receive the execution and value they deserve.

« WhyWho »

The Team

Ralph M. Drybrough
Managing Partner
  • Principal at Presidio Financial Partners
  • Merrill Lynch Private Banking and Investment Group
  • UBS Private Wealth Management
  • Indiana University
Jeffrey D. Wycoff
Managing Partner
  • Principal at Presidio Financial Partners
  • Merrill Lynch Private Banking and Investment Group
  • UCLA
Nick Deans
Managing Director
  • Managing Member at Moorings Capital
  • Managing Partner at Qorval LLC
  • Associate at Lehman Brothers
  • Associate at Asian Direct Capital Management
  • MBA, UC Berkeley
  • Yale University
Paul Touchstone
Managing Director
  • Managing Director at Fort Point Capital Partners
  • Senior Investment Strategist at Stone & Youngberg
  • Vice President & Portfolio Manager at First Bank
  • Director of Operations at Schroeder Capital Management
  • Western State College
Ted Bruenner
Investor in Residence
  • Investor in Residence at Fort Point Capital Partners
  • Senior Analyst at Soros Fund Management
  • Analyst/Trader at Graham Capital Management
  • Deal at Chase Manhattan Foreign Exchange
  • Harvard University
Jed Clark
Chief Compliance Officer
  • Senior Compliance Associate with Gordian Compliance Solutions, LLC
  • Independent Consultant, hedge fund and broker-dealer compliance
  • Compliance Analyst, Conifer Securities, LLC
  • J.D., magna cum laude, University of California, Hastings College of the Law
  • University of Utah
Angeles Gottheil
Senior Analyst
  • Consultant at FINCA International
  • Georgetown University, SFS
Dean Pagonis
Analyst
  • Analyst at Abraxas Corporation
  • American University
Jonah Peters
Analyst
  • Investment Management Consultant at FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
  • University of Washington
Chris Fenster
Chief Financial Officer
  • CEO at Propeller Industries
  • Board Member/Treasure at Juma Ventures
  • CFO at Bevology LLC, Signature Wines, and Swobo Clothing Co.
  • Colgate University

Contact Us

Fort Point Capital Partners LLC
275 Sacramento Street
8th Floor
San Francisco, California
94111

contact

May 17

Why IWM

One of Fort Point’s Managing Partners, Jeff Wycoff was recently interviewed by Index Universe on why our firm owns IWM, the iShares Russell 2000 ETF. “IWM has a deep options market, so that allows us to create a…

Mar 21

Garbage In, Garbage Out

Back in January of 2011, Alexi Savov, then a Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago (and now a finance professor at NYU), published a paper in the Journal of Finance arguing that garbage tonnage is…

Feb 21

Buffett Panning Gold

In the last five years so called, “safe” fixed income assets have outperformed equities. Similarly, gold has been in an even longer bull market. In a recent Fortune article, Warren Buffet contends that fixed income assets that appear…

Jan 6

Don’t Settle for Less

The idea of float – when a bank holds your money for a few days interest free – is nothing new. But the disparity of etf and stock settlement periods is a less obvious example of how broker…

Dec 19

Misperceiving the Risk of Crashes: A Whole Different Ball Game

When bidding for free agents, Major League teams often exuberantly discount risk, particularly the risk of injury; instead placing emphasis on recent performance rather than a player’s longer track record. This is called recency bias. Nate Silver in his

Login

  
Contact Us Lost password

Recent Posts